Neoadjuvant Cemiplimab for Stage II to IV Cutaneous Squamous-Cell Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: In a pilot study involving patients with cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma, a high percentage of patients had a pathological complete response with the use of two doses of neoadjuvant cemiplimab before surgery. Data from a phase 2 study are needed to confirm these findings. METHODS: We conducted a phase 2, confirmatory, multicenter, nonrandomized study to evaluate cemiplimab as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resectable stage II, III, or IV (M0) cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. Patients received cemiplimab, administered at a dose of 350 mg every 3 weeks for up to four doses, before undergoing surgery with curative intent. The primary end point was a pathological complete response (the absence of viable tumor cells in the surgical specimen) on independent review at a central laboratory, with a null hypothesis that a pathological complete response would be observed in 25% of patients. Key secondary end points included a pathological major response (the presence of viable tumor cells that constitute ≤10% of the surgical specimen) on independent review, a pathological complete response and a pathological major response on investigator assessment at a local laboratory, an objective response on imaging, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were enrolled and received neoadjuvant cemiplimab. On independent review, a pathological complete response was observed in 40 patients (51%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 39 to 62) and a pathological major response in 10 patients (13%; 95% CI, 6 to 22). These results were consistent with the pathological responses determined on investigator assessment. An objective response on imaging was observed in 54 patients (68%; 95% CI, 57 to 78). Adverse events of any grade that occurred during the study period, regardless of whether they were attributed to the study treatment, were observed in 69 patients (87%). Grade 3 or higher adverse events that occurred during the study period were observed in 14 patients (18%). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant therapy with cemiplimab was associated with a pathological complete response in a high percentage of patients with resectable cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma. (Funded by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and Sanofi; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04154943.).

Anti-CD73 antibody activates human B cells, enhances humoral responses and induces redistribution of B cells in patients with cancer

Background CD73 is widely expressed on immune cells playing a critical role in immunomodulatory functions including cell adhesion and migration, as a costimulatory molecule for T cells and in production of adenosine. The function of CD73 expressed on B cells has not been fully characterized. Mupadolimab is an anti-human CD73 antibody that activates B cells. We evaluated the characteristics of this antibody and its effects on immune cells in vitro and in vivo. Methods Mupadolimab binding to CD73, inhibition of CD73 enzymatic activity, and effects on lymphocyte activation were evaluated in vitro by measuring changes in immunophenotype by flow cytometry. Cryogenic-transmission electron microscopy was used to determine epitope binding. Effects on human B cells in vivo were evaluated in immunodeficient NSG-SGM3 mice immunized with SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viral antigens. Safety and immune effects were evaluated in the completed dose escalation portion of a phase 1 trial conducted in patients with cancer. Results Mupadolimab binds to a unique epitope on CD73POS B cells resulting in their activation and differentiation through B cell receptor signaling pathways. Mupadolimab induces expression of CD69, CD83, CD86 and MHC class II on B cells along with morphological transformation into plasmablasts and expression of CD27, CD38 and CD138. These effects are independent of adenosine. Mupadolimab binds to the N-terminal of CD73 in the closed position and competitively inhibits substrate binding. Mupadolimab enhanced antigen specific antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and influenza hemagglutinin in humanized mouse models. Mupadolimab was evaluated as a monotherapy in a phase 1 trial (NCT03454451) in 34 patients with advanced cancer and demonstrated binding to CD73POS circulating cells and transient reduction in the number of B cells, with return of CD73NEG B cells with memory phenotype. No dose-limiting toxicities or changes in serum immunoglobulins were seen. Conclusions Mupadolimab activates B cells and stimulates the production of antigen specific antibodies. The effects in patients with cancer suggest that activated, CD69POS B cells redistribute to lymphoid tissues. Minor tumor regression was observed in several patients. These results support further investigation of mupadolimab as an immunotherapy for cancer and its potential use as a vaccine adjuvant. Trial registration number NCT03454451.

Activating CD73 on B cells as a target for immunotherapy of COVID-19 and viral associated cancers: clinical activity in human papilloma virus positive (HPV) head and neck squamous cell cancers (HNSCC)

BackgroundMupadolimab (mupa) is a humanized FcγR binding-deficient IgG1 anti-CD73 antibody that has agonistic properties.1 CD73 is involved in production of adenosine and in cellular trafficking. Mupa reacts with the majority of circulating B cells leading to activation and expression of differentiation markers CD69, CD138 and CD38, and transformation into plasmablasts with secretion of IgM and IgG. B cell activation provided the rationale to develop mupa for immunotherapy of cancer and Covid-19. Intratumor HPV specific B cells have been reported in HNSCC.2 This report describes properties of mupa and the early signs of clinical activity in HPV+ HNSCC.MethodsELISA and flow cytometry were used to measure binding of anti-CD73. Humanized NSG-SGM3 mice were used to evaluate effects of Mupa on human anti-SARS CoV2 spike protein (SP) response. CD73 expression in biopsies was measured by immunohistochemistry. Mupa (IV q 3 weeks) with or without pembrolizumab is being evaluated in an ongoing phase 1 trial in patients with refractory cancers.ResultsMupa binding to CD73 was blocked by APCP, an analog of adenosine diphosphate that locks CD73 in the closed conformation, indicating mupa binding to the open conformation. Cross blocking and cellular internalization studies showed that mupa is distinct from other anti-CD73 antibodies such as MEDI9447 and AD2. NSG-SGM3 mice were immunized with 50 µg SP subcutaneously and treated with mupa 10mg/kg or control IgG IP. Mupa treated animals mounted an antigen specific human anti-SP response;no antibody responses were seen in controls (P=0.02). In the dose-escalation portion of the phase 1 trial, mupa doses of ≥12 mg/kg saturated CD73 sites on circulating B cells. High stromal CD73 expression was observed in HPV+ HNSCC biopsies from 5 evaluable patients with chemotherapy and anti-PD1 refractory disease, and tumor regression was seen in 2 of these patients receiving 7 and 16 cycles of ≥12 mg/kg mupa without pembrolizumab. Safety of mupa+pembrolizumab was evaluated in 16 patients with no MTD reached and no changes in serum immunoglobulins. Transient reductions in circulating CD73 B cells were observed consistent with redistribution to lymphoid tissues.ConclusionsCD73 plays a role in B cell activation and differentiation. Mupa is an antibody with agonistic activity that stimulates B cells and enhances antigen specific antibody production. This activity supports a strategy to combine mupa with pembrolizumab to enhance both humoral and cellular immunity in the treatment of viral associated cancers such as HPV+HNSCC, and viral infections.Trial RegistrationNCT03454451ReferencesWillingham S, Criner G, Hill C, Hu S, Rudnick J, Daine-Matsuoka B, Hsieh J, Mashhedi H, Hotson A, Brody J, Marron T, Piccione E, Buggy J, Mahabhashyam S, Jones W, Mobasher M, Miller R. Characterization and Phase 1 trial of a B cell activating anti-CD73 antibody for the immunotherapy of COVID-19. medRxiv, 2020;https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.10.20191486.Wieland A, Patel M, Cardenas M, Eberhardt C, Hudson W, Obeng R, Griffith C, Wang X, Chen Z, Kissick H, Saba N, Ahmed R. Defining HPV-specific B cell responses in patients with head and neck cancer. Nature 2020;https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2931-3.Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by Western IRB, approval number 1-1066703-1. Participants gave informed consent before taking part.

Semiqualitative research protocol to explore cancer care workforce perceptions of the health system response to COVID-19 preparations in Southeast Queensland, Australia.

INTRODUCTION: Sars-CoV-2 is a novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19 officially declared pandemic in March 2020. Health systems worldwide responded with swift changes to increase workflow capacity while protecting the vulnerable, including those with cancer. This led to unprecedented and rapid restructuring of health service provision. Published data from the 2003 SARS pandemic focuses on medical and nursing staff, overlooking other departmental employees such as administration officers or food service workers. Our protocol aims to document directives and adjustments communicated to staff in two cancer care departments and correlate this with measures of distress and perceived preparedness across the spectrum of all staff involved in cancer care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We use a semiqualitative approach comprising weekly diarising of events and simultaneous staff surveys. Principal investigators will document changes at a metropolitan quaternary cancer centre and a regional cancer centre. Communications, directives and changes will be diarised in real time in four executional domains. Simultaneously, prospective voluntary self-administered online surveys will be conducted at regular intervals by staff. The survey assesses the perceived institutional preparedness and personal well-being, with a combination of Likert scaled and open response questions. A semiquantitative self-assessment of distress adapted from National Comprehensive Cancer Network distress thermometer is incorporated. Additionally, open-text personal reflections on themes including difficult decisions will be invited. Survey participants will be drawn from various work areas of the cancer care departments: administrative staff, health professionals, for example, allied health, ancillary workers, nursing and medical. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has been reviewed and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee (LNR/2020/QRBW/62982). Published literature on domains of distress neglects categories of healthcare worker who form an essential part of the care delivery team. Our study hopes to gather insights about psychosocial impact and adjustment which could direct responses in future emergencies.